Princeton professor criticises Supreme Court. Washington, D.C., March 17. Professor Edward S. Corwin, of Princeton University, told the Senate Judiciary Committee this morning that the Supreme Court majority had "frequently forgotten it's supreme obligation in ruling on new deal legislation." In say
4 x 5 in. or smaller
- Date
- 1937
- Collection
- Harris & Ewing
- Archive
- Library of Congress (via Wikimedia Commons)
- Type
- photograph
- Original size
- 10,047 × 7,926 pixels
Public domainsafest
Reason: Harris & Ewing collection, given to the Library of Congress without copyright restrictions.
Read from: Commons licence category: PD-Harris-Ewing; no CC BY, CC BY-SA, GFDL or deletion tag on the file page; permission field: No known restrictions on publication. For more information, see Harris & Ewing Photographs - Rights and Restrictions Inf.
Credit line
"Princeton professor criticises Supreme Court. Washington, D.C., March 17. Professor Edward S. Corwin, of Princeton University, told the Senate Judiciary Committee this morning that the Supreme Court majority had "frequently forgotten it's supreme obligation in ruling on new deal legislation." In say" (1937). Harris & Ewing. Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Princeton_professor_criticises_Supreme_Court._Washington,_D.C.,_March_17._Professor_Edward_S._Corwin,_of_Princeton_University,_told_the_Senate_Judiciary_Committee_this_morning_that_the_LCCN2016871378.tifNeed photos for a whole script? Add Find Any Photo to Claude and ask for this one by its id: 293470.
More like this

Princeton Prexy gives Senate Committee views on president's court reform plan. Washington, D.C., March 24. Harold W. Doods, President of Princeton University, testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee today pictured the President's court reorganization plan as "a scheme by which President Roo
1937 · Library of Congress

Princeton professor says tax program would cost more than it would yield. Washington, D.C., Feb. 7. Harley L. Lutz, Professor of Public Finance at Princeton University, told a Special Tax Committee on Senators that the administrations proposed Reciprocal Tax Program would cost more than it would tak
1939 · Library of Congress

In spotlight before Senate Judiciary Committee. Washington, D.C., March 19. William Draper Lewis, Director of the American Institute, was the principal witness before the Senate Judiciary Committee today. He told the committee that the tendency of a majority of the Supreme Court tends to create "jus
1937 · Library of Congress

Bryan Mawr professor tells Senate Neutrality Group Thomas Act needs amendments. Washington, D.C., April 17. Charles G. Fenwick, Professor of International Law at Bryn Mawr College, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the Thomas Neutrality Act should be amended to allow either Congress o
1939 · Library of Congress

Questioned by senate Judiciary subcommittee. Washington, D.C., Dec. 4. Prof. Henry W. Edgerton, (right) recently nominated by President Roosevelt for the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, as he appeared at the Capitol for questioning by the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee in regard to whether he opposed
1937 · Library of Congress

President's court plan "leap in dark" Yale professor tells Senate Committee. Washington, D.C., March 31. Appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee today, Edwin Borchard Professor of Constitutional Law at Yale, declared the President's court reorganization plan is a "speculative leap in the dar
1937 · Library of Congress

In spotlight before Senate Judiciary Committee. Washington, D.C., April 2. Walter F. Dodd, Chicago lawyer and constitutional authority, appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee today to oppose the President's court bill as a measure calling for the "surrender of all essential principles of our
1937 · Library of Congress

Dean Young B. Smith of Columbia School. Washington, D.C., March 25. Young B. Smith, Dean of the Columbia Law Faculty at Columbia University is shown on the stand before the Senate Judiciary Committee. He was opposed the bill saying that it should be done by constitutional amendment. On the suggestio
1937 · Library of Congress